Perplexity
ChatPerplexity
Product overview
Name of Agent: Perplexity
Monetisation/Usage price: free
20, pro, access to labs and MCP connectors
200, higher rate limits
Website: (https://www.perplexity.ai/, archived)
Category: Chat
Company & accountability
Developer: Perplexity
Name of legal entity: Perplexity AI, Inc.
For profit company?: Yes
Parent company?: Perplexity
AI safety/trust framework: None found
Technical capabilities & system architecture
User interface and interaction design: Chatbot
User roles: Operator (directing the agent to complete tasks), Executor (can take control and do things themselves), Evaluator (can give feedback via thumbs up/down buttons and steer it via follow-up responses)
Component accessibility: Closed source
Autonomy & control
Autonomy level and planning depth: L1-L5: deep research is L5, regular chat is L1-L3, learning mode is L1-L2
User approval requirements for different decision types: The turn-based interaction paradigm by default requires user approval (issuing further instructions) to continue the interaction. Model can also ask follow-up/clarifying questions
Execution monitoring, traces, and transparency: Visible CoT and action trace documenting all activity
Emergency stop and shut down mechanisms and user control: User can pause/stop the agent at any time
Usage monitoring and statistics and patterns: None, will just tell you when you've hit their limit
Ecosystem interaction
Identify to humans?: None found, although an official Perplexity X account post mentions “active work on content authenticity” and references C2PA / Content Credentials (link) but this is only in reference to general developments not Perplexity specific
Web conduct: - When Perplexity fetches a webpage on a user's behalf “the content isn't stored for training—it's used immediately to answer your question.” Therefore, Perplexity claims that because this is different than crawling for indexes, robots.txt is ignored for PerplexityUser ((link, archived), (link, archived))
- PerplexityBot respects robots.txt (link, archived)
Safety, evaluation & impact
Technical guardrails and safety measures: None found
Sandboxing and containment approaches: None found
What types of risks were evaluated?: None found, although work on BrowseSafe (link) likely is applied to Perplexity
(Internal) safety evaluations and results: None found
Third-party testing, audits, and red-teaming: None found
Any known incidents?: None found